![ubsan: signed integer overflow in uniform_int_distribution implementation · Issue #5684 · fish-shell/fish-shell · GitHub ubsan: signed integer overflow in uniform_int_distribution implementation · Issue #5684 · fish-shell/fish-shell · GitHub](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/291142/53202900-8ad80180-35dc-11e9-9d95-2da595b9c281.png)
ubsan: signed integer overflow in uniform_int_distribution implementation · Issue #5684 · fish-shell/fish-shell · GitHub
![Ben Porter on Twitter: "Generating uniform integers using <random> is not portable across compilers!! This example shows identical seed results in different numbers across the big three compilers. (Note: the engine itself Ben Porter on Twitter: "Generating uniform integers using <random> is not portable across compilers!! This example shows identical seed results in different numbers across the big three compilers. (Note: the engine itself](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQZhLBvUIAAaajz.jpg)
Ben Porter on Twitter: "Generating uniform integers using <random> is not portable across compilers!! This example shows identical seed results in different numbers across the big three compilers. (Note: the engine itself
![c++ - uniform_int_distribution used wrong here? (my results seem not equally distributed) - Stack Overflow c++ - uniform_int_distribution used wrong here? (my results seem not equally distributed) - Stack Overflow](https://i.stack.imgur.com/ZNUsG.jpg)
c++ - uniform_int_distribution used wrong here? (my results seem not equally distributed) - Stack Overflow
std::uniform_int_distribution<__int128_t>{INT64_MIN, INT64_MAX} produces out-of-range values · Issue #50862 · llvm/llvm-project · GitHub
Exploiting the Profanity Flaw. On 20 Sep 2022, a tweet indicated that… | by Amber Group | Amber Group | Medium
![c++ - uniform_int_distribution used wrong here? (my results seem not equally distributed) - Stack Overflow c++ - uniform_int_distribution used wrong here? (my results seem not equally distributed) - Stack Overflow](https://i.stack.imgur.com/7kY4u.jpg)